This specification defines a Jingle application type for transferring files between two entities. The protocol provides a modular framework that enables the exchange of information about the file to be transferred as well as the negotiation of parameters such as the transport to be used.
WARNING: This Standards-Track document is Experimental. Publication as an XMPP Extension Protocol does not imply approval of this proposal by the XMPP Standards Foundation. Implementation of the protocol described herein is encouraged in exploratory implementations, but production systems should not deploy implementations of this protocol until it advances to a status of Draft.
Series: XEP
Number: 0234
Publisher: XMPP Standards Foundation
Status:
Experimental
Type:
Standards Track
Version: 0.2
Last Updated: 2008-03-20
Approving Body: XMPP Council
Dependencies: XMPP Core, XEP-0096, XEP-0166
Supersedes: None
Superseded By: None
Short Name: NOT YET ASSIGNED
Wiki Page: <http://wiki.jabber.org/index.php/Jingle File Transfer (XEP-0234)>
JabberID:
stpeter@jabber.org
URI:
https://stpeter.im/
The preferred venue for discussion of this document is the Standards discussion list: <http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards>.
Errata may be sent to <editor@xmpp.org>.
The Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) is defined in the XMPP Core (RFC 3920) and XMPP IM (RFC 3921) specifications contributed by the XMPP Standards Foundation to the Internet Standards Process, which is managed by the Internet Engineering Task Force in accordance with RFC 2026. Any protocol defined in this document has been developed outside the Internet Standards Process and is to be understood as an extension to XMPP rather than as an evolution, development, or modification of XMPP itself.
The following keywords as used in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119: "MUST", "SHALL", "REQUIRED"; "MUST NOT", "SHALL NOT"; "SHOULD", "RECOMMENDED"; "SHOULD NOT", "NOT RECOMMENDED"; "MAY", "OPTIONAL".
1. Introduction
2. How It Works
3. Scenarios
3.1. Fallback
3.2. Transport Selection
4. Implementation Notes
4.1. Mandatory to Implement Technologies
4.2. Preference Order of Transport Methods
4.3. Migration from XEP-0096
5. Security Considerations
6. IANA Considerations
7. XMPP Registrar Considerations
7.1. Protocol Namespaces
7.2. Jingle Application Formats
7.3. Jingle Transport Methods
8. XML Schema
Notes
Revision History
SI File Transfer [1] defines the current XMPP protocol extension for file transfer. However, that protocol has several drawbacks, most related to the Stream Initiation [2] protocol on which it depends:
To overcome these drawbacks, this specification defines a file transfer negotiation method that meets the following requirements:
This section provides a friendly introduction to Jingle file transfer.
First, the party that wishes to initiate the file transfer determines the receiver's capabilities (via Service Discovery [4] or Entity Capabilities [5]). In this example, we assume that the receiver supports the following service discovery features (note: these features may not reflect final namespace assignments):
The initiator then sends a Jingle session-initiation request to a potential receiver. The content-type of the request specifies two things:
In this example, the initiation request specifies a file offer and a transport method of bytestreams (i.e., XEP-065).
<iq from='kingclaudius@shakespeare.lit/castle' id='jingle1' to='laertes@shakespeare.lit/castle' type='set'> <jingle xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle' action='session-initiate' initiator='kingclaudius@shakespeare.lit/castle' sid='851ba2'> <content creator='initiator' name='a-file-offer'> <description xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle:apps:file-transfer'> <offer> <file xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/si/profile/file-transfer' name='test.txt' size='1022' hash='552da749930852c69ae5d2141d3766b1' date='1969-07-21T02:56:15Z'> <desc>This is a test. If this were a real file...</desc> </file> </offer> </description> <transport xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle:transports:bytestreams'/> </content> </jingle> </iq>
The responder immediately acknowledges receipt of the session-initiate.
<iq from='laertes@shakespeare.lit/castle' id='jingle1' to='kingclaudius@shakespeare.lit/castle' type='result'/>
The parties would then attempt to negotiate use of the SOCKS5 Bytestreams transport method, as described in XEP-0065.
More detailed scenarios follow.
Currently, XEP-0096 does not enable the parties to fall back to a second method (e.g., In-Band Bytestreams) if the first method tried (e.g., SOCKS5 Bytestreams) does not work. This problem is addressed by Jingle. Consider the following protocol flow.
<iq from='kingclaudius@shakespeare.lit/castle' id='jingle1' to='laertes@shakespeare.lit/castle' type='set'> <jingle xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle' action='session-initiate' initiator='kingclaudius@shakespeare.lit/castle' sid='851ba2'> <content creator='initiator' name='a-file-offer'> <description xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle:apps:file-transfer'> <offer> <file xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/si/profile/file-transfer' name='test.txt' size='1022' hash='552da749930852c69ae5d2141d3766b1' date='1969-07-21T02:56:15Z'> <desc>This is a test. If this were a real file...</desc> </file> </offer> </description> <transport xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle:transports:bytestreams'/> </content> </jingle> </iq>
The responder immediately acknowledges receipt of the session-initiate.
<iq from='laertes@shakespeare.lit/castle' id='jingle1' to='kingclaudius@shakespeare.lit/castle' type='result'/>
The receiver would then sends a session-accept.
<iq from='laertes@shakespeare.lit/castle' id='accept1' to='kingclaudius@shakespeare.lit/castle' type='set'> <jingle xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle' action='session-accept' initiator='kingclaudius@shakespeare.lit/castle' sid='a73sjjvkla37jfea'> <content creator='initiator' name='a-file-offer'> <description xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle:apps:file-transfer'> <offer> <file xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/si/profile/file-transfer' name='test.txt' size='1022' hash='552da749930852c69ae5d2141d3766b1' date='1969-07-21T02:56:15Z'> <desc>This is a test. If this were a real file...</desc> </file> </offer> </description> <transport xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle:transports:bytestreams'/> </content> </jingle> </iq>
The initiator acknowledges the session-accept action.
<iq from='laertes@shakespeare.lit/castle' id='accept1' to='kingclaudius@shakespeare.lit/castle' type='result'/>
Now the parties attempt to negotiate use of SOCKS5 Bytestreams as defined in XEP-0065.
However, let us imagine that the SOCKS5 Bytestreams negotiation fails. The initiator or responder can then suggest the use of In-Band Bytestreams by sending a content-replace action. Here we assume that the responder sends a content-replace action including a request for the file originally offered and a transport of IBB.
<iq from='laertes@shakespeare.lit/castle' id='replace1' to='kingclaudius@shakespeare.lit/castle' type='set'> <jingle xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle' action='content-replace' initiator='kingclaudius@shakespeare.lit/castle' sid='a73sjjvkla37jfea'> <content creator='responder' name='a-file-request'> <description xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle:apps:file-transfer'> <request> <file xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/si/profile/file-transfer' hash='552da749930852c69ae5d2141d3766b1' name='test.txt'/> </file> </request> </description> <transport xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle:transports:ibb'/> </content> </jingle> </iq>
The initiator then acknowledges the content-replace action.
<iq from='kingclaudius@shakespeare.lit/castle' id='replace1' to='laertes@shakespeare.lit/castle' type='result'/>
If the content definition is acceptable, the initiator then sends a content-accept action to the responder.
<iq to='kingclaudius@shakespeare.lit/castle' id='accept2' to='laertes@shakespeare.lit/castle' type='set'> <jingle xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle' action='content-accept' initiator='kingclaudius@shakespeare.lit/castle' sid='a73sjjvkla37jfea'> <content creator='responder' name='a-file-request'> <description xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle:apps:file-transfer'> <request> <file xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/si/profile/file-transfer' hash='552da749930852c69ae5d2141d3766b1' name='test.txt'/> </file> </request> </description> <transport xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle:transports:ibb'/> </content> </jingle> </iq>
The responder then acknowledges the content-accept action.
<iq from='laertes@shakespeare.lit/castle' id='accept2' to='kingclaudius@shakespeare.lit/castle' type='result'/>
The parties then attempt to use In-Band Bytestreams.
XEP-0096 enable the initiator to offer more than one transport and for the receiving party to choose its desired transport. This flow can be emulated in Jingle negotiation as follows.
<iq from='kingclaudius@shakespeare.lit/castle' id='jingle1' to='laertes@shakespeare.lit/castle' type='set'> <jingle xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle' action='session-initiate' initiator='kingclaudius@shakespeare.lit/castle' sid='851ba2'> <content creator='initiator' name='first-transport'> <description xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle:apps:file-transfer'> <offer> <file xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/si/profile/file-transfer' name='test.txt' size='1022' hash='552da749930852c69ae5d2141d3766b1' date='1969-07-21T02:56:15Z'> <desc>This is a test. If this were a real file...</desc> </file> </offer> </description> <transport xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle:transports:bytestreams'/> </content> <content creator='initiator' name='second-transport'> <description xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle:apps:file-transfer'> <offer> <file xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/si/profile/file-transfer' name='test.txt' size='1022' hash='552da749930852c69ae5d2141d3766b1' date='1969-07-21T02:56:15Z'> <desc>This is a test. If this were a real file...</desc> </file> </offer> </description> <transport xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle:transports:ibb'/> </content> </jingle> </iq>
The responder immediately acknowledges receipt of the session-initiate.
<iq from='laertes@shakespeare.lit/castle' id='jingle1' to='kingclaudius@shakespeare.lit/castle' type='result'/>
The receiver then sends a content-remove in order to choose the desired transport, which in this case is IBB.
<iq from='laertes@shakespeare.lit/castle' id='remove1' to='kingclaudius@shakespeare.lit/castle' type='set'> <jingle xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle' action='content-remove' initiator='kingclaudius@shakespeare.lit/castle' sid='a73sjjvkla37jfea'> <content creator='initiator' name='first-transport'> <description xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle:apps:file-transfer'> <offer> <file xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/si/profile/file-transfer' name='test.txt' size='1022' hash='552da749930852c69ae5d2141d3766b1' date='1969-07-21T02:56:15Z'> <desc>This is a test. If this were a real file...</desc> </file> </offer> </description> <transport xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle:transports:bytestreams'/> </content> </jingle> </iq>
The initiator acknowledges the content-remove action.
<iq from='laertes@shakespeare.lit/castle' id='remove1' to='kingclaudius@shakespeare.lit/castle' type='result'/>
The receiver then sends a session-accept.
<iq from='laertes@shakespeare.lit/castle' id='accept1' to='kingclaudius@shakespeare.lit/castle' type='set'> <jingle xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle' action='session-accept' initiator='kingclaudius@shakespeare.lit/castle' sid='a73sjjvkla37jfea'> <content creator='initiator' name='a-file-offer'> <description xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle:apps:file-transfer'> <offer> <file xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/si/profile/file-transfer' name='test.txt' size='1022' hash='552da749930852c69ae5d2141d3766b1' date='1969-07-21T02:56:15Z'> <desc>This is a test. If this were a real file...</desc> </file> </offer> </description> <transport xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle:transports:bytestreams'/> </content> </jingle> </iq>
The initiator acknowledges the session-accept action.
<iq from='laertes@shakespeare.lit/castle' id='accept1' to='kingclaudius@shakespeare.lit/castle' type='result'/>
Now the initiator sends the file using In-Band Bytestreams as defined in XEP-0047.
All implementations MUST support the In-Band Bytestreams transport method.
An application MAY present transport methods in any order, except that the In-Band Bytestreams method MUST be the lowest preference.
Support for Jingle file transfer can be determined through discovery of the 'urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle:apps:file-transfer' namespace (see Protocol Namespaces regarding issuance of one or more permanent namespaces), via either service discovery or entity capabilities. If the initiator knows that the receiver supports Jingle file transfer, it SHOULD attempt negotiation using XEP-0166 rather than XEP-0095.
In order to secure the data stream, implementations SHOULD use encryption methods appropriate to the transport method being used. For details, refer to the specifications for those transport methods.
No interaction with the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) [8] is required as a result of this document.
Until this specification advances to a status of Draft, its associated namespaces shall be:
Upon advancement of this specification, the XMPP Registrar [9] shall issue permanent namespaces in accordance with the process defined in Section 4 of XMPP Registrar Function [10].
The following namespaces are requested, and are thought to be unique per the XMPP Registrar's requirements:
The XMPP Registrar shall include "file-transfer" in its registry of Jingle application formats. The registry submission is as follows:
<application> <name>file-transfer</name> <desc>Jingle sessions for the transfer of a file</desc> <transport>reliable</transport> <doc>XEP-xxxx</doc> </application>
The XMPP Registrar shall add to its registry of Jingle transport methods definitions for the reliable transport methods defined in XEP-0047 and XEP-0065. The registry submissions are as follows:
<transport> <name>bytestreams</name> <desc>A method for exchanging data over SOCKS5 Bytestreams.</desc> <type>reliable</type> <doc>XEP-0065</doc> </transport> <transport> <name>ibb</name> <desc>A method for exchanging data over In-Band Bytestreams.</desc> <type>reliable</type> <doc>XEP-0047</doc> </transport>
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> <xs:schema xmlns:xs='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema' targetNamespace='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle:apps:file-transfer' xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle:apps:file-transfer' elementFormDefault='qualified'> <xs:import namespace='http://jabber.org/protocol/si/profile/file-transfer' schemaLocation='http://www.xmpp.org/schemas/file-transfer.xsd'/> <xs:element name='description'> <xs:complexType> <xs:choice> <xs:element ref='offer'/> <xs:element ref='request'/> </xs:choice> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> <xs:element name='offer'> <xs:complexType> <xs:sequence xmlns:ft='http://jabber.org/protocol/si/profile/file-transfer'> <xs:element ref='ft:file'/> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> <xs:element name='request'> <xs:complexType> <xs:sequence xmlns:ft='http://jabber.org/protocol/si/profile/file-transfer'> <xs:element ref='ft:file'/> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> </xs:schema>
1. XEP-0096: SI File Transfer <http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0096.html>.
2. XEP-0095: Stream Initiation <http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0095.html>.
3. XEP-0166: Jingle <http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0166.html>.
4. XEP-0030: Service Discovery <http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0030.html>.
5. XEP-0115: Entity Capabilities <http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0115.html>.
6. XEP-0065: SOCKS5 Bytestreams <http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0065.html>.
7. XEP-0047: In-Band Bytestreams <http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0047.html>.
8. The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) is the central coordinator for the assignment of unique parameter values for Internet protocols, such as port numbers and URI schemes. For further information, see <http://www.iana.org/>.
9. The XMPP Registrar maintains a list of reserved protocol namespaces as well as registries of parameters used in the context of XMPP extension protocols approved by the XMPP Standards Foundation. For further information, see <http://www.xmpp.org/registrar/>.
10. XEP-0053: XMPP Registrar Function <http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0053.html>.
Added transport negotiation scenario.
(psa)Initial published version.
(psa)Corrected use of content-replace action; specified that the In-Band Bytestreams transport method is mandatory-to-implement but must have the lowest preference order.
(psa)END