Abstract: | This document specifies best practices to be followed by Jabber/XMPP clients about when to lock into, and unlock away from, resources. |
Author: | Matthew Miller |
Copyright: | © 1999 - 2011 XMPP Standards Foundation. SEE LEGAL NOTICES. |
Status: | Experimental |
Type: | Informational |
Version: | 0.1 |
Last Updated: | 2011-04-11 |
WARNING: This Informational document is Experimental. Publication as an XMPP Extension Protocol does not imply approval of this proposal by the XMPP Standards Foundation. Implementation of the best practice or protocol profile described herein is encouraged in exploratory implementations, although production systems are advised to carefully consider whether it is appropriate to deploy implementations of this protocol before it advances to a status of Draft.
1. Introduction
2. General Rules
2.1. Initial Conversation State
2.2. Locking a Conversation
2.3. Unlocking a Conversation
3. User Agent Implementation Notes
3.1. User Experience Considerations
3.2. Idle Conversations
3.3. Overall Inactivity
Appendices
A: Document Information
B: Author Information
C: Legal Notices
D: Relation to XMPP
E: Discussion Venue
F: Requirements Conformance
G: Notes
H: Revision History
Section 5.1 of XMPP IM [1] defines the concept of a "one-to-one chat session" and recommends that clients support the behavior described there, including:
This specification reinforces the recommendations from XMPP-IM and provides additional implementation guidance to developers of XMPP clients. It is hoped that wider deployment of clients that adhere to the advice provided here will result in an improved user experience.
A client MUST start conversations in the unlocked state. In this state, a client MUST send <message/>s to a conversee's bare JID.
Once a client receives a chat <message/> from the conversee, whether or not this client initiated the conversation, it MUST lock the conversation. The client MUST remember the conversee's full JID and send further correspondence to this full JID until one of the unlocking conditions are met.
A client MUST unlock a chat session from a resource when one of the following conditions is met:
This section is non-normative, but provides additional guidelines for clients that interact directly with users.
To further improve the user experience, clients are strongly encouraged to implement Chat State Notifications [2] and adhere to the recommendations from Best Practices for Message Threads [3].
A client MAY take into account the lack of activity of a conversation. Exactly how much inactivity constitutes an idle conversation is left to implementations to determine.
A client MAY take into account the overall lack of activity of a user, in which case it is RECOMMENDED the client send a <presence/> update to trigger any conversations to unlock. The exact conditions and <presence/> information conveyed is left to implementations to determine.
Series: XEP
Number: 0296
Publisher: XMPP Standards Foundation
Status:
Experimental
Type:
Informational
Version: 0.1
Last Updated: 2011-04-11
Approving Body: XMPP Council
Dependencies: XMPP Core, XMPP IM, XEP-0085, XEP-0201
Supersedes: None
Superseded By: None
Short Name: NOT_YET_ASSIGNED
Source Control:
HTML
This document in other formats:
XML
PDF
Email:
linuxwolf@outer-planes.net
JabberID:
linuxwolf@outer-planes.net
The Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) is defined in the XMPP Core (RFC 3920) and XMPP IM (RFC 3921) specifications contributed by the XMPP Standards Foundation to the Internet Standards Process, which is managed by the Internet Engineering Task Force in accordance with RFC 2026. Any protocol defined in this document has been developed outside the Internet Standards Process and is to be understood as an extension to XMPP rather than as an evolution, development, or modification of XMPP itself.
The primary venue for discussion of XMPP Extension Protocols is the <standards@xmpp.org> discussion list.
Discussion on other xmpp.org discussion lists might also be appropriate; see <http://xmpp.org/about/discuss.shtml> for a complete list.
Errata can be sent to <editor@xmpp.org>.
The following requirements keywords as used in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119: "MUST", "SHALL", "REQUIRED"; "MUST NOT", "SHALL NOT"; "SHOULD", "RECOMMENDED"; "SHOULD NOT", "NOT RECOMMENDED"; "MAY", "OPTIONAL".
1. RFC 6121: Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP): Instant Messaging and Presence <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6121>.
2. XEP-0085: Chat State Notifications <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0085.html>.
3. XEP-0201: Best Practices for Message Threads <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0201.html>.
Note: Older versions of this specification might be available at http://xmpp.org/extensions/attic/
Initial published version.
(psa)Initial draft
(mm)END