XEP-0363: HTTP File Upload

WARNING: This Standards-Track document is Experimental. Publication as an XMPP Extension Protocol does not imply approval of this proposal by the XMPP Standards Foundation. Implementation of the protocol described herein is encouraged in exploratory implementations, but production systems are advised to carefully consider whether it is appropriate to deploy implementations of this protocol before it advances to a status of Draft.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

XMPP protocol extensions already define methods for peer-to-peer file transfer such as SI File Transfer (XEP-0096) [1] or Jingle File Transfer (XEP-0234) [2] however due to their very nature of being peer-to-peer they don't work very well in scenarios where it is requeried to send a file to multiple receipients or multiple resources of the same receipient at once. They also don’t work alongside offline storage, MUC history and Message Archive Management (XEP-0313) [3].

Uploading files manually to an HTTP server and sharing the link has been a workaround for this for a long time now. While users have a variety of services to choose from the downside of this manual approach is that an XMPP client can not automate this process on behalf of the user since these services don’t share a common api. Furthermore using a third party service would probably require the user to enter addional credentials into their XMPP client specifically for the file upload.

This XEP defines an approach to request permissions from another entity to upload a file to a specific path on an HTTP server and at the same time receive an URL from which that file can later be downloaded again. These tuples consisting of a PUT and a GET-URL are called slots.

2. Requirements

• Be as easy to implement as possible. This is grounded on the idea that most programming languages already have HTTP libraries available.
• Be agnostic toward the distributon of the actual URL. Users can choose to send the URL in the body of a message stanza, utilize Out-of-Band Data (XEP-0066) [4] or even use it as their avatar in User Avatar (XEP-0084) [5]
• Do not provide any kind of access control or security beyond Transport Layer Security in form of HTTPS and long random pathes that are impossible to guess. That means everyone who knows the URL SHOULD be able to access it.

3. Discovering Support

An entity advertises support for this protocol by including the "urn:xmpp:http:upload" in its service discovery information features as specified in Service Discovery (XEP-0030) [6] or section 6.3 of Entity Capabilities (XEP-0115) [7]. A users server SHOULD include any known entities that provide such services into its service discovery items.

Example 1. Client sends service discovery request to server

<iq from='romeo@montague.tld/garden'
    id='step_01'
    to='montague.tld'
    type='get'>
  <query xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/disco#items'/>
</iq>

Example 2. Server replies to service discovery request

<iq from='montague.tld'
    id='step_01'
    to='romeo@montague.tld/garden'
    type='result'>
  <query xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/disco#items'>
    <item jid='upload.montague.tld' name='HTTP File Upload' />
    <item jid='conference.montague.tld' name='Chatroom Service' />
  </query>
</iq>

Example 3. Client sends service discorvey request to upload service

<iq from='romeo@montague.tld/garden'
    id='step_02'
    to='upload.montague.tld'
    type='get'>
  <query xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/disco#info'/>
</iq>

Example 4. Upload service replies to service discovery request

<iq from='upload.montague.tld'
    id='step_02'
    to='romeo@montague.tld/garden'
    type='result'>
  <query xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/disco#info'>
    <identity category='store'
              type='file'
              name='HTTP File Upload' />
    <feature var='urn:xmpp:http:upload' />
  </query>
</iq>

4. Requesting a slot

A client requests a new upload slot by sending an IQ-get to the upload service containing a <request> child element qualified by the urn:xmpp:http:upload namespace. This element MUST include elements <filename> and <size> containing the file name and size respectively.

An additional element <content-type> containing the Content-Type is OPTIONAL.

Example 5. Client requests a slot on the upload service

<iq from='romeo@montague.tld/garden'
    id='step_03'
    to='upload.montague.tld'
    type='get'>
  <request xmlns='urn:xmpp:http:upload'>
    <filename>my_juliet.png</filename>
    <size>23456</size>
    <content-type>image/jpeg</content-type>
  </request>
</iq>

The upload service responds with both a PUT and a GET URL wrapped by a <slot> element. The service SHOULD keep the file name and especially the file ending intact. Using the same hostname for PUT and GET is OPTIONAL. The host SHOULD provide Transport Layer Security.

Example 6. The upload service responsd with a slot

<iq from='upload.montague.tld'
    id='step_03'
    to='romeo@montague.tld/garden'
    type='result'>
  <slot xmlns='urn:xmpp:http:upload'>
    <put>https://upload.montague.tld/4a771ac1-f0b2-4a4a-9700-f2a26fa2bb67/my_juliet.png</put>
    <get>https://download.montague.tld/4a771ac1-f0b2-4a4a-9700-f2a26fa2bb67/my_juliet.png</get>
  </slot>
</iq>

5. Error conditions

Instead of providing the client with a slot the service MAY respond with an error if the requested file size is too large.

Example 7. Alternative response by the upload service if the file size was too large

<iq from='upload.montague.tld'
    id='step_03'
    to='romeo@montague.tld/garden'
    type='error'>
  <request xmlns='urn:xmpp:http:upload'>
    <filename>my_juliet.png</filename>
    <size>23456</size>
  </request>
  <error type='modify'>
    <not-acceptable xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas' />
    <text xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas>file too large. the maximum file size is 20000 bytes</text>
    <file-too-large xmlns='urn:xmpp:http:upload'>
      <max-size>20000</max-size>
    </file-too-large>
  </error>
</iq>

For any other type of error the service SHOULD respond with appropriate error types to indicate temporary or permanent errors.

Example 8. Alternative response by the upload service to indicate a temporary error after the client exceeded a quota

<iq from='upload.montague.tld'
    id='step_03'
    to='romeo@montague.tld/garden'
    type='error'>
  <request xmlns='urn:xmpp:http:upload'>
    <filename>my_juliet.png</filename>
    <size>23456</size>
  </request>
  <error type='wait'>
    <resource-constraint xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas' />
    <text xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas>Quota reached. You can only upload 5 files in 5 minutes</text>
  </error>
</iq>

Example 9. Alternative response by the upload service to indicate a permanent error to a client that is not allowed to upload files

<iq from='upload.montague.tld'
    id='step_03'
    to='romeo@montague.tld/garden'
    type='error'>
  <request xmlns='urn:xmpp:http:upload'>
    <filename>my_juliet.png</filename>
    <size>23456</size>
  </request>
  <error type='cancel'>
    <not-allowed xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas' />
    <text xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas>Only premium members are allowed to upload files</text>
  </error>
</iq>

6. Upload

The actual upload of the file happens via HTTP-PUT and is out of scope of this document. The upload service MUST reject the file upload if the Content-Length does not match the size of the slot request. The service SHOULD reject the file if the Content-Type has been specified beforehand and does not match. The service MAY assume application/octet-stream as a Content-Type if it the client did not specficy a Content-Type at all.

There is no further XMPP communication required between the upload service and the client. A HTTP status Code of 201 means that the server is now ready to serve the file via the provided GET URL. If the upload fails for whatever reasons the client MAY request a new slot.

7. Implementation Notes

The upload service SHOULD choose an appropriate timeout for the validity of the PUT URL. Since there is no reason for a client to wait between requesting the slot and starting the upload relativly low time out values of around 60s are RECOMENDED.

It is RECOMMENDED that the service stores the files for as long as possible which is of course limited by storage capacity. A service MAY choose to store the latest x MiB of a given user.

8. Security Considerations

• Client implementors MUST consider the fact that without additional end-to-end-encryption files uploaded to a service described in this document will store those files in plain text on that service. Client implementors SHOULD either use this only for semi public files (for example files shared in a public MUC or a PEP Avatar) or implement appropriate end-to-end encryption.
• Service implementors SHOULD use long randomized parts in their URLs making it impossible to guess the location of arbitrary files
• Server operators SHOULD consider the responsibilty that comes with storing user data and MAY consider appropriate measures such as full disk encryption.

9. IANA Considerations

This document requires no interaction with the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA).

10. XMPP Registrar Considerations

11. XML Schema

tbd

Appendices

Appendix A: Document Information

Series: XEP
Number: 0363
Publisher: XMPP Standards Foundation
Status: Experimental
Type: Standards Track
Version: 0.1.1
Last Updated: 2016-01-05
Approving Body: XMPP Council
Dependencies: XMPP Core, XEP-0001, Etc.
Supersedes: None
Superseded By: None
Short Name: NOT_YET_ASSIGNED
Source Control: HTML
This document in other formats: XML  PDF

Appendix B: Author Information

Appendix C: Legal Notices

Appendix D: Relation to XMPP

The Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) is defined in the XMPP Core (RFC 6120) and XMPP IM (RFC 6121) specifications contributed by the XMPP Standards Foundation to the Internet Standards Process, which is managed by the Internet Engineering Task Force in accordance with RFC 2026. Any protocol defined in this document has been developed outside the Internet Standards Process and is to be understood as an extension to XMPP rather than as an evolution, development, or modification of XMPP itself.

Appendix E: Discussion Venue

The primary venue for discussion of XMPP Extension Protocols is the <standards@xmpp.org> discussion list.

Discussion on other xmpp.org discussion lists might also be appropriate; see <http://xmpp.org/about/discuss.shtml> for a complete list.

Errata can be sent to <editor@xmpp.org>.

Appendix F: Requirements Conformance

The following requirements keywords as used in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119: "MUST", "SHALL", "REQUIRED"; "MUST NOT", "SHALL NOT"; "SHOULD", "RECOMMENDED"; "SHOULD NOT", "NOT RECOMMENDED"; "MAY", "OPTIONAL".

Appendix G: Notes

Appendix H: Revision History

Note: Older versions of this specification might be available at http://xmpp.org/extensions/attic/

END