Historically, XMPP has had no system for simple text styling. Instead, specifications like XHTML-IM (XEP-0071)  that require full layout engines have been used, leading to numerous security issues with implementations. Some entities have also performed their own styling based on identifiers in the body. While this has worked well in the past, it is not interoperable and leads to entities each supporting their own informal styling languages.
This specification aims to provide a single, interoperable formatted text syntax that can be used by entities that do not require full layout engines.
Many important terms used in this document are defined in Unicode . The terms "left-to-right" (LTR) and "right-to-left" (RTL) are defined in Unicode Standard Annex #9 . The term "formatted text" is defined in RFC 7764 .
Clients that support message styling MUST advertise the fact by including a feature of "urn::xmpp:styling:0" in response to Service Discovery (XEP-0030)  information requests and in their Entity Capabilities (XEP-0115)  profiles.
Parsers implementing message styling will first parse blocks and then parse child blocks or spans if allowed by the specific block type.
Individual lines of text that are not inside of a preformatted text block are considered a "plain" block. Plain blocks are not bound by styling directives and do not imply formatting themselves, but they may contain spans which imply formatting. Plain blocks may not contain child blocks.
A preformatted text block is started by a line beginning with "```" (U+0060 GRAVE ACCENT), and ended by a line containing only three grave accents or the end of the parent block (whichever comes first). Preformatted text blocks cannot contain child blocks or spans. Text inside a preformatted block SHOULD be displayed in a monospace font.
A quotation is indicated by one or more lines with a byte stream beginning with a '>' (U+003E GREATER-THAN SIGN). They are terminated by the first new line that is not followed by a greater-than sign, or the end of the parent block (whichever comes first). Block quotes may contain any child block, including other quotations. Lines inside the block quote MUST have the first leading whitespace character trimmed before parsing the child block. It is RECOMMENDED that text inside of a block quote be indented or distinguished from the surrounding text in some other way.
Matches of spans between two styling directives MUST contain some text between the two styling directives and the opening styling directive MUST be located at the beginning of the line, after a whitespace character, or after a different opening styling directive. The opening styling directive MUST NOT be followed by a whitespace character and the closing styling directive MUST NOT be preceeded by a whitespace character. Spans are always parsed from the beginning of the byte stream to the end and are lazily matched. Characters that would be styling directives but do not follow these rules are not considered when matching and thus may be present between two other styling directives.
For example, each of the following would be styled as indicated:
Nothing would be styled in the following messages (where "\n" represents a new line):
Any text inside of a block that is not part of another span is implicitly considered to be inside of a "plain text" span.
Text enclosed by '_' (U+005F LOW LINE) is emphasized and SHOULD be displayed in italics.
Text enclosed by '*' (U+002A ASTERISK) is strongly emphasized and SHOULD be displayed with a heavier font weight than the surrounding text (bold).
Text enclosed by '~' (U+007E TILDE) SHOULD be displayed with a horizontal line through the middle.
Text enclosed by a '`' (U+0060 GRAVE ACCENT) is a preformatted span SHOULD be displayed inline in a monospace font. A preformatted span may only contain a single plain span. Inline formatting directives inside the preformatted span are not rendered. For example, the following all contain valid preformatted spans:
*`monospace and bold`*
On rare occasions styling hints may conflict with the contents of a message. For example, if the user sends the emoji "> _ <" it would be interpreted as a block quote. Senders may indicate to the receiver that a particular message SHOULD NOT be styled by adding an empty <unstyled> element qualified by the "urn:xmpp:styling:0" namespace.
This document does not define a regular grammar and thus styling cannot be matched by a regular expression. Instead, a simple parser can be constructed by first parsing all text into blocks and then recursively parsing the child-blocks inside block quotations, the spans inside individual lines, and by returning the text inside preformatted blocks without modification.
It is RECOMMENDED that styling directives be displayed and formatted in the same manner as the text they apply to. For example, the string "*emphasis*" would be rendered as "*emphasis*".
This specification does not provide a mechanism for removing styling from individual spans or blocks within a styled message. Implementations are free to implement their own workarounds, for example by inserting Unicode non-printable characters to invalidate styling directives, but no specific technique is known to be widely supported.
When displaying styling directives, developers should ensure sufficient contrast so that visually impaired users are able to distinguish the styling directives from the background color. Care should also be taken to ensure that formatting designed to differentiate styling directives from surrounding text does not make the text more difficult to read for visually impaired users.
Styled text may be rendered poorly by screen readers. When applying formatting it may be desirable to include directives to exclude styling directives from being read, or to add markers to the final output that have semantic meaning for screen readers. For example, in an web based client an emphasis span might be converted to an HTML <em> element.
Authors of message styling parsers should take care that improperly formatted messages cannot lead to buffer overruns or code execution.
Though message styling is not compatible with Markdown, some of its styles are similar. Markdown parsers often allow arbitrary HTML to be inserted into documents and therefore MUST NOT be used to parse the format defined in this document even if they are flexible enough to do so.
This document requires no interaction with the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) .
This specification defines the following XML namespace:
Upon advancement of this specification from a status of Experimental to a status of Draft, the XMPP Registrar  shall add the foregoing namespace to the registries located at <https://xmpp.org/registrar/disco-features.html>, as described in Section 4 of XMPP Registrar Function (XEP-0053) .
The XMPP Registrar  shall also add the foregoing namespace to the Jabber/XMPP Protocol Namespaces Registry located at <https://xmpp.org/registrar/namespaces.html>. Upon advancement of this specification from a status of Experimental to a status of Draft, the XMPP Registrar  shall remove the provisional status from this registry entry.
If the protocol defined in this specification undergoes a revision that is not fully backwards-compatible with an older version, the XMPP Registrar shall increment the protocol version number found at the end of the XML namespaces defined herein, as described in Section 4 of XEP-0053.
This document does not define any new XML structure requiring a schema.
The author wishes to thank Kevin Smith for his review and feedback.
This document in other formats: XML PDF
This XMPP Extension Protocol is copyright © 1999 – 2020 by the XMPP Standards Foundation (XSF).
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this specification (the "Specification"), to make use of the Specification without restriction, including without limitation the rights to implement the Specification in a software program, deploy the Specification in a network service, and copy, modify, merge, publish, translate, distribute, sublicense, or sell copies of the Specification, and to permit persons to whom the Specification is furnished to do so, subject to the condition that the foregoing copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Specification. Unless separate permission is granted, modified works that are redistributed shall not contain misleading information regarding the authors, title, number, or publisher of the Specification, and shall not claim endorsement of the modified works by the authors, any organization or project to which the authors belong, or the XMPP Standards Foundation.
## NOTE WELL: This Specification is provided on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, express or implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. ##
In no event and under no legal theory, whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise, unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall the XMPP Standards Foundation or any author of this Specification be liable for damages, including any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising from, out of, or in connection with the Specification or the implementation, deployment, or other use of the Specification (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill, work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all other commercial damages or losses), even if the XMPP Standards Foundation or such author has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
This XMPP Extension Protocol has been contributed in full conformance with the XSF's Intellectual Property Rights Policy (a copy of which can be found at <https://xmpp.org/about/xsf/ipr-policy> or obtained by writing to XMPP Standards Foundation, P.O. Box 787, Parker, CO 80134 USA).
The Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) is defined in the XMPP Core (RFC 6120) and XMPP IM (RFC 6121) specifications contributed by the XMPP Standards Foundation to the Internet Standards Process, which is managed by the Internet Engineering Task Force in accordance with RFC 2026. Any protocol defined in this document has been developed outside the Internet Standards Process and is to be understood as an extension to XMPP rather than as an evolution, development, or modification of XMPP itself.
The primary venue for discussion of XMPP Extension Protocols is the <firstname.lastname@example.org> discussion list.
Discussion on other xmpp.org discussion lists might also be appropriate; see <http://xmpp.org/about/discuss.shtml> for a complete list.
Errata can be sent to <email@example.com>.
The following requirements keywords as used in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119: "MUST", "SHALL", "REQUIRED"; "MUST NOT", "SHALL NOT"; "SHOULD", "RECOMMENDED"; "SHOULD NOT", "NOT RECOMMENDED"; "MAY", "OPTIONAL".
7. The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) is the central coordinator for the assignment of unique parameter values for Internet protocols, such as port numbers and URI schemes. For further information, see <http://www.iana.org/>.
8. The XMPP Registrar maintains a list of reserved protocol namespaces as well as registries of parameters used in the context of XMPP extension protocols approved by the XMPP Standards Foundation. For further information, see <https://xmpp.org/registrar/>.
Note: Older versions of this specification might be available at http://xmpp.org/extensions/attic/
Accepted as Draft as per Council vote from 2020-10-07.
Remove description of mechanism for disabling styling on individual spans and blocks, users can do this themselves without us documenting the use of a codepoint that's not specifically for this purpose.
Add ability to disable styling, further clarify accessibility considerations, and mention that Styling is not Markdown in the security considerations section.
Clarify accessibility considerations section and be consistent about use of the term "styling directives".
Make rules consistent with examples that show multiple styling directives being applied to the same text.
Clarify block quote termination and white space trimming.
Clarify language around strong emphasis.
Reorder block and span sections, simplify block parsing, and update the definition of a span.
Clarify block quote and plain text parsing and formatting behavior.
Minor clarifications and updates, add security considerations, and expand the glossary.
First draft approved by the XMPP Council.