Sometimes it is desirable to include a small bit of binary data in an XMPP stanza. Typical use cases might be to include icon or emoticon in a message, a thumbnail in a file transfer request, a rasterized image in a whiteboarding session, or a small bit of media in a data form. Currently, there is no lightweight method for including such data in an XMPP stanza, since existing methods (e.g., In-Band Bytestreams (XEP-0047) ) are designed for larger blobs of data and therefore require some form of negotiation (e.g., via SI File Transfer (XEP-0096)  or Jingle File Transfer (XEP-0234) ).
This document specifies just such a lightweight method. The key building blocks are:
The RECOMMENDED approach is for the sender to include the cid when communicating with the recipient. The recipient SHOULD then check its cache of data to determine if the data identified by that cid is cached. If the data is cached, the recipient would then load its cached data. If the data is not cached, the recipient would then retrieve the data by sending an IQ-get to the sender (or potentially some other entity) containing an empty <data/> element whose 'cid' attribute specifies the data to be retrieved, to which the sender would reply with an IQ-result containing a <data/> element whose XML character data provides the binary data.
The <data/> element MUST be used only to encapsulate small bits of binary data and MUST NOT be used for large data transfers. Naturally the definitions of "small" and "large" are rather loose. In general, the data SHOULD NOT be more than 8 kilobytes, and dedicated file transfer methods (e.g., SOCKS5 Bytestreams (XEP-0065)  or In-Band Bytestreams (XEP-0047) ) SHOULD be used for exchanging blobs of data larger than 8 kilobytes. However, implementations or deployments MAY impose their own limits.
If the data to be shared is particularly small (e.g., less than 1k), then the sender MAY send it directly by including a <data/> element directly in a <message/>, <presence/>, or <iq/> stanza. The following rules apply:
The sender can refer to data that it hosts by including a cid in the data it sends. The following example shows how to include the cid in XHTML-IM (XEP-0071)  but any appropriate format can be used, such as Data Forms Media Element (XEP-0221) .
The recipient can then retrieve the data from the sender as described in the next section.
Data is requested and transferred using the XMPP <iq/> stanza type by making reference to the cid. In particular, the recipient requests the binary data by sending an IQ-get containing an empty <data/> element with a 'cid' attribute that matches the cid URI previously communicated.
The recipient then would either return an error (e.g., <item-not-found/> if it does not have data matching the Content-ID) or return the data.
It is RECOMMENDED for the recipient to cache data; however, the recipient MAY opt not to cache data, for example because it runs on a device that does not have sufficient space for data storage.
The default behavior is for the recipient to cache the data only for the life of the entity's application session (not a client's presence session with the server or the controlling user's communication session with the contact from whom the user received the data); that is, the recipient would clear the cache when the application is terminated or restarted.
As a hint regarding the suggested period for caching the data, the sender MAY include a 'max-age' attribute whenever it sends a <data/> element. The meaning of the 'max-age' attribute exactly matches that of the Max-Age attribute from RFC 2965.
If it is not suggested to cache the data (e.g., because it is ephemeral), the value of the 'max-age' attribute MUST be "0" (the number zero).
A recipient SHOULD cache data based on the hash of the data as encapsulated in the cid. However, if a hash cannot be extracted from the cid, if the recipient does not support the hashing algorithm used, or the recipient does not support hashes, then the recipient SHOULD cache based on the JID of the sender.
To exchange binary data, the data is encapsulated as the XML character data of a <data/> element qualified by the 'urn:xmpp:bob' namespace, where the data MUST be encoded as Base64 in accordance with Section 4 of RFC 4648  (note: the Base64 output MUST NOT include whitespace and MUST set the number of pad bits to zero).
The following attributes are defined for the <data/> element.
|cid||A Content-ID that can be mapped to a cid: URL as specified in RFC 2111 . The 'cid' value SHOULD be of the form email@example.com, where the "algo" is the hashing algorithm used (e.g., "sha1" for the SHA-1 algorithm as specified in RFC 3174 ) and the "hash" is the hex output of the algorithm applied to the binary data itself.||REQUIRED|
|max-age||A suggestion regarding how long (in seconds) to cache the data; the meaning matches the Max-Age attribute from RFC 2965 .||RECOMMENDED|
|type||The value of the 'type' attribute MUST match the syntax specified in RFC 2045 . That is, the value MUST include a top-level media type, the "/" character, and a subtype; in addition, it MAY include one or more optional parameters (e.g., the "audio/ogg" MIME type in the example shown below includes a "codecs" parameter as specified in RFC 4281 ). The "type/subtype" string SHOULD be registered in the IANA MIME Media Types Registry , but MAY be an unregistered or yet-to-be-registered value.||REQUIRED if the <data/> element is non-empty|
The following example illustrates the format (line endings are provided for readability only).
If an entity supports the protocol specified herein, it MUST advertise that fact by returning a feature of "urn:xmpp:bob" in response to Service Discovery (XEP-0030)  information requests.
In order for an application to determine whether an entity supports this protocol, where possible it SHOULD use the dynamic, presence-based profile of service discovery defined in Entity Capabilities (XEP-0115) . However, if an application has not received entity capabilities information from an entity, it SHOULD use explicit service discovery instead.
The ability to include arbitrary binary data implies that it is possible to send scripts, applets, images, and executable code, which may be potentially harmful. To reduce the risk of such exposure, an implementation MAY choose to not display or process such data but instead either completely ignore the data, show only the value of the 'alt' attribute, or prompt a human user for approval (either explicitly via user action or implicitly via a list of approved entities from whom the user will accept binary data without per-event approval).
This document requires no interaction with the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) .
Thanks to Rachel Blackman, Dave Cridland, Zenon Kuder, and Tomasz Sterna for their feedback.
This document in other formats: XML PDF
This XMPP Extension Protocol is copyright © 1999 – 2018 by the XMPP Standards Foundation (XSF).
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this specification (the "Specification"), to make use of the Specification without restriction, including without limitation the rights to implement the Specification in a software program, deploy the Specification in a network service, and copy, modify, merge, publish, translate, distribute, sublicense, or sell copies of the Specification, and to permit persons to whom the Specification is furnished to do so, subject to the condition that the foregoing copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Specification. Unless separate permission is granted, modified works that are redistributed shall not contain misleading information regarding the authors, title, number, or publisher of the Specification, and shall not claim endorsement of the modified works by the authors, any organization or project to which the authors belong, or the XMPP Standards Foundation.
## NOTE WELL: This Specification is provided on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, express or implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. ##
In no event and under no legal theory, whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise, unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall the XMPP Standards Foundation or any author of this Specification be liable for damages, including any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising from, out of, or in connection with the Specification or the implementation, deployment, or other use of the Specification (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill, work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all other commercial damages or losses), even if the XMPP Standards Foundation or such author has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
This XMPP Extension Protocol has been contributed in full conformance with the XSF's Intellectual Property Rights Policy (a copy of which can be found at <https://xmpp.org/about/xsf/ipr-policy> or obtained by writing to XMPP Standards Foundation, P.O. Box 787, Parker, CO 80134 USA).
The Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) is defined in the XMPP Core (RFC 6120) and XMPP IM (RFC 6121) specifications contributed by the XMPP Standards Foundation to the Internet Standards Process, which is managed by the Internet Engineering Task Force in accordance with RFC 2026. Any protocol defined in this document has been developed outside the Internet Standards Process and is to be understood as an extension to XMPP rather than as an evolution, development, or modification of XMPP itself.
The primary venue for discussion of XMPP Extension Protocols is the <firstname.lastname@example.org> discussion list.
Discussion on other xmpp.org discussion lists might also be appropriate; see <http://xmpp.org/about/discuss.shtml> for a complete list.
Given that this XMPP Extension Protocol normatively references IETF technologies, discussion on the <email@example.com> list might also be appropriate.
Errata can be sent to <firstname.lastname@example.org>.
The following requirements keywords as used in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119: "MUST", "SHALL", "REQUIRED"; "MUST NOT", "SHALL NOT"; "SHOULD", "RECOMMENDED"; "SHOULD NOT", "NOT RECOMMENDED"; "MAY", "OPTIONAL".
17. The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) is the central coordinator for the assignment of unique parameter values for Internet protocols, such as port numbers and URI schemes. For further information, see <http://www.iana.org/>.
18. The XMPP Registrar maintains a list of reserved protocol namespaces as well as registries of parameters used in the context of XMPP extension protocols approved by the XMPP Standards Foundation. For further information, see <https://xmpp.org/registrar/>.
Note: Older versions of this specification might be available at http://xmpp.org/extensions/attic/
Per a vote of the XMPP Council, advanced status to Draft; concurrently, the XMPP Registrar issued the urn:xmpp:bob namespace.
Modified cid generation rules to use a hash of the data instead of a UUID (of the form email@example.com); modified caching rules to typically base checking on the hash, not the sender JID.
Added section on determining support.
Simplified the protocol; removed fetch element because the cid: URI uniquely identifies the data; changed the name of the protocol to something more catchy.
More clearly described recommended protocol and usage; added fetch element to diambiguate data from reference; cleaned up text throughout.
Removed alt attribute; more clearly specified where to include the data element in message, presence, and IQ stanzas; moved use cases to other specifications; removed service discovery features; modified examples.
Generalized text regarding inclusion of parameters in type attribute per RFC 2045; added max-age attribute, matching semantics from RFC 2965; added section on caching of data; more clearly specified generation of Content-ID.
Allowed inclusion of codecs parameter in type attribute per RFC 4281.
Added service discovery feature for in-band message images use case.
Initial published version.
Separately described service discovery feature for inclusion of the data element in file previews.
Described use cases for previewing data to be exchanged in file transfers and for inclusion of media information in data forms.
Changed syntax to not use data: URL scheme; added cid and type attributes; described use cases for messaging and data retrieval.